Ending the war against japan essay

Headed by Stimson and James Byrneswhom Truman would soon name secretary of state, the Interim Committee was a group of respected statesmen and scientists closely linked to the war effort.

McCloyclaimed to have opposed using the bomb, but there is no firm evidence of any substantial contemporary opposition. No one will ever know whether the war would have ended quickly without the atomic bomb or whether its use really saved more lives than it destroyed.

It was also an expression of the American temperament; the United States was accustomed to winning wars and dictating the peace. In the minds of many Americans—and the citizens of other western nations—these two streams merged to create a powerful argument for banning atomic weapons.

It is possible to construct scenarios in which the use of the atomic bomb might have been avoided, but to most of the actors the events of had a grim logic that yielded no easy alternatives.

After that, Japanese supporters of peace were able to enlist Hirohito to order a surrender. The Japanese saw the emperor as embodying in a near-mystical way the divine spirit of the Japanese race.

As he listened to them argue that the United States should refrain from using the bomb and that it should share its atomic secrets with the rest of the world after the war, Byrnes felt that he was dealing with unworldly intellectuals who had no grasp of political and diplomatic realities.

He neither took their suggestions seriously nor discussed them with Truman, who most likely would have shared his attitude anyway. A discussion that focuses primarily on the need to employ the bomb in order to save lives—the lives of Japanese civilians as well as those of American soldiers—is incomplete.

The decision to use the atomic bomb

Moreover, American leaders learned that Japan was seeking to open talks with the Soviet Union in the hopes of making a deal that would forestall Soviet entry into the Pacific war. Thereafter events moved quickly and inexorably.

Moreover, American leaders learned that Japan was seeking to open talks with the Soviet Union in the hopes of making a deal that would forestall Soviet entry into the Pacific war.

Islam, Democracy, and the West. General Curtis LeMaythe commander of American air forces in the Pacific, estimated that by the end of September he would have destroyed every target in Japan worth hitting. The scale of the operation was to be similar to that of the Normandy invasion in France in Junewhich involvedAllied troops in the first 24 hours and approximatelyothers by the end of the first week of July.

The Japanese surrender offer that reached Washington on August 10 requested the retention of the emperor.

Ending the War Against Japan Essay

The decision to use the atomic bomb Written By: The Japanese saw the emperor as embodying in a near-mystical way the divine spirit of the Japanese race. Doubts about the wisdom of using the atomic bomb grew in subsequent generations of Americans but were never accepted by a majority.

In addition to those killed instantly, many died over the next year of severe burns and radiation sickness. Direct and visible support from the U. When the Americans landed, the Japanese intended to hit them with everything they had, to impose on them casualties that might break their will.

Truman regarded the Soviet Union as a valued ally in the just-concluded fight against Nazi Germany, but he distrusted it as a totalitarian state and was wary of its postwar plans. The American people felt as though they have put everything on the line to defeat the Japanese and would like nothing less than to see them surrender unconditionally and as long as we are taking responsible authority on our terms of the Japanese surrender we can end the war and increase strength and peace.

The Atomic Bomb: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

The compromises 21st-century textbooks have struck appear understandable if not necessary. Throughout July, intelligence reports claimed that troop strength on Kyushu was steadily escalating.

By the mid s historians such as Gar Alperovitz had drawn up what was virtually a charge sheet, a belated indictment for war crimes. America’s Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb on Japan. The United States’ rightful decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a military measure calculated to speed the end of the war.

The bombings were nuclear attacks during World War II against the Empire of Japan by the United States.

SearchWorks Catalog

Although Japan had signed international agreements to prevent war, the Japanese government in the s was increasingly controlled by forces determined to carve out a regional sphere of influence through military might.

- The period between the end of the American Civil War in and the outbreak of World War I in saw increased international concern about the conduct and destructiveness of war. Ending The War Against Japan Part 2. 27 terms. History 11 - WW II - TRB 4, 5, 8, and 27 terms.

20th Century Test Study.

The decision to use the atomic bomb

68 terms. An alternate solution in ending the war was to have a massive invasion of Japan. When the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima it killed about 90, people. 40, were injured, but.

The Moral Debate: Atomic Bomb atomic bombs compared to the amount of casualties if there had been an invasion in Japan. 6 long years of war were brought to an end because of the bombings. In the article, Ending The War Against Japan: Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb, the author provides information on the war in the Pacific which involved the United States and Japan.

After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor the United States entered the second World War in

Ending the war against japan essay
Rated 3/5 based on 39 review